Galatians
5:1, 13–25—We Americans are
justly jealous of our freedoms; they were won and preserved at great cost. But,
with freedom comes responsibility. As Christians, we have received an even
greater freedom—freedom from the curse of the Law. With this freedom also comes
great responsibility—the responsibility to use our freedom in service to God
and neighbor. The only way we are able to do this is to be led by the Spirit,
whose fruit is love, joy, peace, patience, kindness, goodness, faithfulness,
gentleness, and self-control.
Christian
freedom is living by the Spirit
Today’s reading from Paul’s letter to the Galatians is
an explanation of the proper meaning of freedom for the Christian. In the
opening verse, Paul pleads with believers to remain free and to avoid taking
back “the yoke of slavery” meaning the burden of obeying the former laws, rites,
and rituals. Then the explains that freedom is being servants of one another
through love and proceeds to list what characteristics are part of this
Christian freedom.
Paul uses vivid imagery in V. 15 “bite,” “devour,” “consume,” especially appropriate to the
dog-eat-dog world we often describe ourselves as living in today.
“Flesh” V.16
of course, is not “the body” but
rather, “the sin power in the body”
(human rebellion against God.) It is the corrupted human nature. This is especially
evident from the ear-filing catalog of sins mentioned in Vv. 19-21, some of
which are clearly sins of the mind rather than sins of the body; emulations and
envying for example.
“Faith” V.22 is better translated “fidelity” or “faithfulness.” “Temperance”
in V. 23 had a broader meaning than the world has today. Modern usage so often restricts
the word to the proper use of alcohol, yet it is the Holy Spirit’s intention
that we apply the word to all areas of life; food, pleasure, work, emotion,
etc.
Mention of Christ in V. 24 calls to Paul’s mind His
crucifixion, leading Paul to state one of his favorite concepts (See Romans
6:1-11; Galatians 2:20), namely, that we Christians share in Christ’s
crucifixion. Incidentally, there is a possible tie-in between the concept and
the circumcision (Vv 2-12) advocated by some of Paul’s readers. Circumcision of
literal flesh is not needed; no. But crucifixion of the flesh, i.e. the body of
sin; is needed, yes! Paul’s proposal, in a sense, is more revolutionary than
that of his readers. Paul does them one better.
[1] The Cross of Christ, copyright © Ed Riojas, Higher Things
[2] Collect for Thursday the week of Pentecost 3, For All the Saints, A Prayer Book For and By the Church, Vol. II © 1995 The American Lutheran Publicity Bureau, Delhi, NY
No comments:
Post a Comment